Which is better for making "Data Containers?" Gluster, OpenEBS or CEPH?on 21 Feb 2021 Posted by Administrator Category: Technology Comments (0) |
 Which is better for making "Data Containers?" Gluster, OpenEBS or CEPH? First Up is Open EBS: OpenEBS is the most widely deployed and easy to use open-source storage solution for Kubernetes. OpenEBS is the leading open-source example of a category of cloud native storage solutions sometimes called Container Attached Storage. OpenEBS is listed as an open-source example in the CNCF Here is the link to that Whitepaper: https://github.com/cncf/sig-storage/blob/master/CNCF Storage Landscape - White Paper.pdf OpenEBS Mayastor is the most recent version. Containers Supported: kubernetes, rust, storage, k8s, nvme, pvc Documents and White Pages https://github.com/openebs/openebs-docs CEPF CEPH OBJECT STORE Images up to 16 exabytes, Configurable striping, In-memory caching, Snapshots, Copy-on-write cloningKernel driver supportKVM/libvirt supportBack-end for cloud solutions Incremental backup, Disaster recovery (multisite asynchronous replication) CEPH FILE SYSTEM, POSIX-compliant semantics Separates metadata from data, Dynamic rebalancing, Subdirectory snapshots, Configurable striping, Kernel driver support FUSE support, NFS/CIFS deployable Here is more from CEPH: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/ We will also take a look at Operating Systems and Chipset Compatibility. Operating Systems to be tested include but are not limited to: Windows, Linux, Apple, Droid GlusterFS or Gluster classic GlusterFS is a scalable network filesystem suitable for data-intensive tasks such as cloud storage and media streaming. GlusterFS is free and open source software and can utilize common off-the-shelf hardware Check back here soon for the full report. Almost done. Check back in a few days when we look at heat and energy consumerd Research by yours truly, |
0 Comments |
|
Please sign in to leave a comment. If you are not yet registered, you may click here to register. |
